who talk more man or woman

The idea that men and women are sánh different that they are from different planets will get in the way of communicating competently in your marriage. Gender stereotypes treat men and women as categories, not individual people who have hopes, wants, and dreams vĩ đại share. It is by sharing these aspects of themselves that couples create a joint reality.

To get beyond gender stereotypes in communication, we first need vĩ đại say what they are. Here are a few stereotypical ideas about how men and women communicate:[1]

Bạn đang xem: who talk more man or woman

  • Women talk more than thở men
  • Communication matters more vĩ đại women than thở men
  • Men talk vĩ đại get things done; women talk vĩ đại make emotional connection
  • Men talk about things, women talk about people, relationships, and feelings
  • Men use language vĩ đại inform, preserve independence and compete vĩ đại maintain status, while women use language vĩ đại enhance cooperation, reflecting their preference for equality and harmony

For some, such ideas about how men and women communicate became unquestioned articles of faith with the publication of John Gray’s Men Are from Mars, Women Are From Venus and Deborah Tannen’s You Just Don’t Understand.[2]

Tannen is a well-respected linguist—a person of authority—who has publicly defended such black-and-white ideas about men and women despite the fact they are widely disputed by some 30 years of research on language, communication, and the sexes.

A close study of Tannen’s work done by Alice Freed, Professor Emerita of Linguistics at Montclair State University, argues that Tannen is an apologist for men[3]. She excuses their insensitivities as part of their “need for independence.” She emphasizes the importance of women adjusting vĩ đại men’s need for status and independence.

In You Just Don’t Understand we can read about Josh, who invites an old high-school friend vĩ đại spend a weekend with him and his wife, Linda. The visit is vĩ đại begin immediately upon Linda’s return from a week’s business trip. Josh did not discuss the invitation with her before he extended it vĩ đại his friend. Tannen describes Linda as being upset by his failure vĩ đại bởi sánh, her feelings being hurt.

It's not about “permission;” it’s about negotiation

According vĩ đại Tannen, Linda’s hurt feelings would disappear if only she understood that for Josh vĩ đại ask permission would imply that he is not independent, not miễn phí vĩ đại act on his own. He would feel controlled by Linda’s wish vĩ đại be consulted.

But crosschecking with your partner is not “seeking permission.” It is being willing vĩ đại negotiate with your spouse what works for both of you. If Josh feels “controlled,” he needs vĩ đại examine that experience.

By the way, Tannen also relies on the old notion that “hurt feelings” are what is important vĩ đại Linda. What is important vĩ đại Linda, is that Josh was unwilling vĩ đại negotiate with her about what he wanted.

Who talks more, men or women?

In The Female Brain, published in 2006, Louann Brizendine, M.D. claimed that women say about đôi mươi,000 words a day, while men say about 7,000.[4] This mirrored the stereotype of women talking three times as much as men.

Mark Liberman, a linguistics professor at the University of Pennsylvania, decided vĩ đại investigate the research that supported such a claim.[5] What he found was that the statement about how much men and women talk came from a self-help book, with no academic citation referencing the statement. Reviewing similar assertions yielded word counts for women ranging from 4,000 vĩ đại 25,000 words, again with no research supporting such statements.

Brizendine retracted her statement when Liberman pointed out his research in a newspaper article, saying the statement would be deleted from future editions. However, the damage was done. This much-publicized, stereotypic sound bite will linger in people’s memories and get recycled in conversations. The retraction will not make the same impression. This is how myths about men and women acquire the status of facts.

It's about status, not gender

A review of 56 studies conducted by linguistics researcher Deborah James and social psychologist Janice Drakich found only two studies showing that women talked more than thở men, while 34 studies found men talked more than thở women.[6] Sixteen of the studies found they talked the same and four showed no clear pattern.

Xem thêm: phân tích bài ai đã đặt tên cho dòng sông

The review demonstrated that the amount that people talk is most likely related vĩ đại the status of the person given the kind of setting in which the conversation occurs. This means that in more formal or public settings, the person who talks more is the person with the higher status.

A 2007 study conducted by Bobbi Carothers, a senior data analyst at Washington University, and Harry Reis, a professor of psychology at the University of Rochester, demonstrates the need for the Mars/Venus theories about the sexes vĩ đại come back vĩ đại earth.[7]

Carothers and Reis re-analyzed data from 13 studies that had shown significant sex differences, and they collected their own data on a variety of psychological indicators, such as relationship interdependence, intimacy, sexuality, agreeableness, emotional stability, and conscientiousness. Using three separate statistical procedures, they looked for measures that could reliably distinguish a person as male or female. Here is what they found:

  • On characteristics such as height, shoulder breadth, arm circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio, men and women fall into distinct groups (called taxons).
  • Gender reliably predicts interest in stereotypic activities such as scrapbooking and cosmetics (women) and boxing and watching pornography (men).

These researchers looked at the data vĩ đại see if they could separate the men from the women based on a particular psychological trait. This is what they found:

  • For most of the psychological traits, including fear of success, criteria for mate selection, and empathy, men and women are from the same planet.
  • A given person—a man, for example—may score in a stereotypic way on one measure (say aggression) and rank low on another stereotypic characteristic (like math ability).

For psychological traits, the overlap between men and women is sánh great that we cannot sort men and women into separate categories based on these traits. Carothers and Reis pointed out that it is not at all unusual for men vĩ đại be empathic and women vĩ đại be good at math.

Why does it matter?

Emphasizing inherent differences between the sexes—a practice that is certainly routine in the popular press and even in some academic circles—can be harmful in the context of a marriage relationship. Adhering vĩ đại gender stereotypes gets in the way of looking at one’s partner as an individual. It is individual people, not categories of male and female, who share their perceptions, feelings, thoughts, hopes, and dreams—creating their own shared relationship reality.


  • Be on guard against old gender stereotypes about communication between men and women.
  • The popular press routinely emphasizes gender differences.
  • You are both individual people, not a category.
  • You can “understand” your spouse.
  • Status is likely more important than thở gender in who talks the most.
  • Individual people, not gender categories, have hopes, dreams, and desires.


1. Cameron, Deborah. “What Language Barrier?” The Guardian October 2007 www.theguardian.com/world/2007/oct/01/gender.books

2. Tannen, Deborah. (1993) Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford University Press.

3. Freed, Alice. “We Understand Perfectly: A Critique of Tannen’s View of Cross-sex Communication.” In Locating Power: Proceedings of The Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference (vol. 1), eds. Kira Hall, Mary Bucholtz, and Birch Moonwomon Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group, 1992.

4. Brizidine, Louann. (2006) The Female Brain. New York: Harmony.

Xem thêm: đi một ngày đàng học một sàng khôn

5. Liberman, Mark. “The Main Job of the Girl Brain,” Language Log (blog), August 6, 2006, http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/ languagelog/archives/003530.html.

6. James, Deborah and Janice Drakich. “Understanding Gender Differences in Amount of Talk: Critical Review of Research,” In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. Deborah Tannen (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).

7. Carothers, Bobbi and Harry Reis. “Men and Women Are from Earth: Examining the Latent Structure of Gender,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104, no. 2 (2013).